ION vs ATI FirePro V8800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.77
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCypressC7A-ION
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 April 2010 (14 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160016
Core clock speed825 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million282 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)208 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate66.003.600
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1150 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 April 2010 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 208 Watt 20 Watt

ATI V8800 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

ION, on the other hand, has 940% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8800 and ION. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8800 is a workstation card while ION is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800
NVIDIA ION
ION

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 23 votes

Rate ION on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.