Radeon 680M vs ATI FirePro V7770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV770Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2012 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800768
Core clock speed625 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors956 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)76 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00105.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs4048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length234 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2.1 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth33.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 76 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has a 817% more advanced lithography process, and 52% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7770 and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7770 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1243 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7770 or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.