Radeon RX 7600M XT vs ATI FirePro V4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.56
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRedwoodNavi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4002048
Core clock speed775 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors627 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate15.50316.0
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache40 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 120 Watt

ATI V4800 has 74% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4800 and Radeon RX 7600M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 94 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4800 or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.