Radeon 8040S vs FirePro S9150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.92
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiStrix Halo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2014 (11 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161024
Core clock speed900 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate158.4179.2
Floating-point processing power5.069 TFLOPS5.734 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs17664
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2014 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 55 Watt

Radeon 8040S has an age advantage of 10 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 327% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9150 and Radeon 8040S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9150 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8040S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 13 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 8040S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9150 or Radeon 8040S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.