Quadro FX 1400 vs FirePro S9000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.98no data
Power efficiency4.06no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiNV41
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 August 2012 (12 years ago)9 August 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed900 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate100.84.200
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs11212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s19.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S9000 5059
+3980%
FX 1400 124

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2012 9 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 55 Watt

FirePro S9000 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1400, on the other hand, has 536.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9000 and Quadro FX 1400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
Quadro FX 1400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 33 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.