ATI 3D Rage vs FirePro S9000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.01no data
Power efficiency4.06no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameTahitiMach64 GT
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 August 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 1996 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed900 MHz44 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million5 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate100.80.04
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs1121

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5EDO
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz57 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s456.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x VGA
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2012 1 April 1996
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 500 nm

FirePro S9000 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 307100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9000 and 3D Rage. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9000 is a workstation graphics card while 3D Rage is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000
ATI 3D Rage
3D Rage

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.