Radeon Graphics 384SP vs FirePro S7150 x2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTongaCezanne
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2016 (10 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792 ×2384
Core clock speed920 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)265 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate103.0 ×240.80
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPS ×21.306 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×28
TMUs112 ×224
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.2.1701.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2016 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 265 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 384SP has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 489% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7150 x2 and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7150 x2 or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.