GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB vs FirePro R5000
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 626 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.27 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.25 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Pitcairn | GT200B |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 February 2013 (13 years ago) | 16 June 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,099 | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 240 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,800 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 39.60 | 46.08 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.267 TFLOPS | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 28 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 224 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 896 MB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 448 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 112.9 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 February 2013 | 16 June 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 896 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 289 Watt |
FirePro R5000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 129% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.
GTX 295 Single PCB, on the other hand, has 21% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FirePro R5000 and GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FirePro R5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
