Radeon RX 570X Mobile vs FirePro M5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking800not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.90no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameWhistlerPolaris
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (15 years ago)10 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802048
Core clock speed725 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1168 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65-110 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Form factorMXM-Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 10 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

FirePro M5950 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

RX 570X Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX 570X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 570X Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950
AMD Radeon RX 570X Mobile
Radeon RX 570X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5950 or Radeon RX 570X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.