Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro M5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1072not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameMadisonHawaii
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2010 (15 years ago)24 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4002816 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors627 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rate13.00176.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS5.632 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs20176 ×2
L1 Cache40 KB704 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s345.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2010 24 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 580 Watt

ATI M5800 has 2130.8% lower power consumption.

R9 290X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M5800 and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5800 or Radeon R9 290X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.