Radeon 780M vs FirePro M2000

Place in performance ranking	1087	300
Place by popularity	not in top-100	46
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Turks GLM	Phoenix
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 July 2012 (12 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	768
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	12.00	139.2
Floating-point performance	0.48 gflops	8.909 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	n/a	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Form factor	chip-down	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M2000 1.10

Radeon 780M 18.30
+1564%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M2000 425

Radeon 780M 7062
+1562%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FirePro M2000 3956

Radeon 780M 40817
+932%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M2000 841

Radeon 780M 12413
+1376%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 −131%	37 +131%
1440p	1−2 −2000%	21 +2000%
4K	0−1	14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1200%

39
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −11400%	110−120 +11400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −172%	85−90 +172%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24 +700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −11400%	110−120 +11400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −671%	54 +671%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −282%	40−45 +282%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −172%	85−90 +172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −667%	23 +667%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −11400%	110−120 +11400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −308%	53 +308%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −557%	46 +557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −164%	29 +164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +77.8%	18 −77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−4800%

45−50
+4800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	20
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−650%

30−33
+650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

14−16

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	9−10
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	10−11
Far Cry 5	0−1	10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−700%

16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

30−33

+0%

30−33

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +0%	32 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +0%	15 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +0%	17 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

This is how FirePro M2000 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

Radeon 780M is 131% faster in 1080p
Radeon 780M is 2000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro M2000 is 78% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 780M is 11400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

FirePro M2000 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Radeon 780M is ahead in 45 tests (67%)
there's a draw in 21 test (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.10	18.30
Recency	1 July 2012	5 January 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	54 Watt

FirePro M2000 has 63.6% lower power consumption.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has a 1563.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 780M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.