ATI Radeon 7500 vs FirePro M2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M2000 with Radeon 7500, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M2000
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 33 Watt
1.11
+11000%

M2000 outperforms ATI 7500 by a whopping 11000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10941531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.310.03
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTurksRV200
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed500 MHz290 MHz
Number of transistors716 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate12.001.740
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs246

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s7.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M2000 1.11
+11000%
ATI 7500 0.01

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M2000 425
+14067%
ATI 7500 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p9-0−1
Full HD16-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Atomic Heart 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1
Atomic Heart 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1
Valorant 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 0.01
Recency 1 July 2012 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 23 Watt

FirePro M2000 has a 11000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7500, on the other hand, has 43.5% lower power consumption.

The FirePro M2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 7500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
ATI Radeon 7500
Radeon 7500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3
4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
46 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M2000 or Radeon 7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.