ATI Radeon 8500 vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with Radeon 8500, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.89
+128800%

D700 outperforms 8500 by a whopping 128800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4271570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.620.03
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTahitiR200
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed850 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate108.82.200
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1288
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.89 0.01
Recency 18 January 2014 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 23 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 128800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 8500, on the other hand, has 1091% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8500 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 40 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 111 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or Radeon 8500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.