ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs FirePro D500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTahitiRV250
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed725 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate69.601.100
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs964
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2014 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 28 Watt

FirePro D500 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 879% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D500 and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 23 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 17 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or Radeon 9000 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.