Quadro NVS 285 vs FirePro D500

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D500 and Quadro NVS 285, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
10.84
+9755%

D500 outperforms NVS 285 by a whopping 9755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4271445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.710.42
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiNV44 A2
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)6 June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$27.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed725 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate69.601.100
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs964

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length279 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.84 0.11
Recency 18 January 2014 6 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 18 Watt

FirePro D500 has a 9754.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 285, on the other hand, has 1422.2% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 285 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 20 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.