ATI Radeon X1900 XT vs FirePro D300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code namePitcairnR580
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)24 January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed850 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0010.00
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs8016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length242 mm242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz725 MHz
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/s46.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2014 24 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

FirePro D300 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1900 XT, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D300 and Radeon X1900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
ATI Radeon X1900 XT
Radeon X1900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 31 vote

Rate Radeon X1900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.