Radeon HD 7750M vs FirePro D300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7290 7330M 7350M 7370M 7400G 7410M 7420G 7430M 7450A 7450M 7470A 7470M 7490M 7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M 7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand 7730M 7750M 7770M 7850M 7870M 7950M 7970M 7970M Crossfire 7970M X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with Radeon HD 7750M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.27
+225%

D300 outperforms HD 7750M by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
HD 7750M HD 7750M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking514833
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.767.84
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code namePitcairnChelsea
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed850 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0018.40
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032
L1 Cache320 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.27 2.85
Recency 18 January 2014 24 April 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

FirePro D300 has a 225% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

HD 7750M, on the other hand, has 436% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7750M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7750M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
HD 7750M Radeon HD 7750M
vs
9800M GTX SLI GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
S10000 Passive 12GB S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
530 Mobile GDDR5 530 Mobile GDDR5
S10000 Passive 12GB S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
S10000 Passive 12GB S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU M3 Max 40-Core GPU
S10000 Passive 12GB S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
S10000 Passive 12GB S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
FirePro D300 D300
vs
HD 7470M HD 7470M
FirePro D300 D300
vs
HD 7950M HD 7950M
FirePro D300 D300
vs
R7 360 896SP R7 360 896SP
FirePro D300 D300
vs
HD 7690M Rebrand HD 7690M Rebrand
FirePro D300 D300
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 37 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D300 or Radeon HD 7750M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.