Radeon 780M vs FirePro D300

#ad 
Buy
FirePro D300 FirePro R5000 FirePro S7000 FirePro W4000 FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000 DVI FirePro W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
Radeon 520 Radeon 530 Radeon 540X Radeon 610 Radeon 610M Radeon 660M Radeon 680M Radeon 740M Radeon 760M Radeon 780M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
8.64

780M outperforms D300 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FirePro D300 FirePro D300
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464319
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Power efficiency4.5682.88
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code namePitcairnHawx Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed850 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate68.00129.6
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−100%
36
+100%
1440p12−14
−83.3%
22
+83.3%
4K7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 49
+0%
49
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 39
+0%
39
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 23
+0%
23
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21
+0%
21
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how FirePro D300 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 100% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 83% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 86% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.64 15.69
Recency 18 January 2014 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 81.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D300 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60 8Q
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
RX 470 Mobile Radeon RX 470 Mobile
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
Quadro K4000 K4000
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
Quadro K620 K620
vs
RX 550 512SP RX 550 512SP
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
9400 GT 9400 GT
Quadro M4000 M4000
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
Tesla C1060 Tesla C1060
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
GT 730A GT 730A
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
GT 730A GT 730A
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GT 730A GT 730A
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
vs
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 32 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1759 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D300 or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.