Quadro RTX 6000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated69
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.32
Power efficiencyno data12.78
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV620TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2009 (15 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores404608
Core clock speed400 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors181 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VHDCI4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 260 Watt

ATI 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 has 712.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 and Quadro RTX 6000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 130 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.