Radeon R9 370 1024SP vs FirePro 2270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1361not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.75no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCedarTrinidad
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 January 2011 (15 years ago)12 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801024
Core clock speed600 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data975 MHz
Number of transistors292 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80062.40
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cache8 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 12 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

FirePro 2270 has 900% lower power consumption.

R9 370 1024SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 and Radeon R9 370 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2270 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 301 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2270 or Radeon R9 370 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.