T550 Mobile vs ATI FireMV 2200 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data37.28
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV280TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2006 (18 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed240 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors36 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate0.96106.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.41 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MBps1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 PCI has 53.3% lower power consumption.

T550 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 PCI and T550 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2200 PCI is a desktop card while T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
FireMV 2200 PCI
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.