Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs ATI FireGL V7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV670Beema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)28 January 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Core clock speed777 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors666 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate12.433.976
Floating-point processing power0.4973 TFLOPS0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1126 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

R2 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7700 and Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7700
FireGL V7700
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7700 or Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.