Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FireGL V7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR480Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048 ×2
Core clock speed507 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors160 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate6.084128.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1232 ×2
TMUs12128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length211 mm315 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin3x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed520 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth33.28 GB/s288.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 375 Watt

ATI FireGL V7100 has 312.1% lower power consumption.

R9 280X2, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7100 and Radeon R9 280X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 280X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7100
FireGL V7100
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
Radeon R9 280X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7100 or Radeon R9 280X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.