Radeon R5 A320 vs ATI FireGL V3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Jet
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed500 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data825 MHz
Number of transistors157 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate2.00016.50
ROPs48
TMUs420

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

R5 A320 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3400 and Radeon R5 A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A320 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3400
FireGL V3400
AMD Radeon R5 A320
Radeon R5 A320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL V3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3400 or Radeon R5 A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.