Radeon RX 7600M XT vs ATI FireGL V3200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.87
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV380Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed500 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors75 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000316.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 120 Watt

ATI FireGL V3200 has 160.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3200 and Radeon RX 7600M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3200 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3200
FireGL V3200
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.