Radeon Graphics 512SP vs ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR360Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)7 March 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed412 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors117 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.29667.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed344 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.02 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 7 March 2020
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9800 X2-256T and Radeon Graphics 512SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9800 X2-256T is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 98 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9800 X2-256T or Radeon Graphics 512SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.