Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.68
Power efficiencyno data6.47
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameR300Tonga
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)2 September 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed325 MHz918 MHz
Number of transistors110 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600102.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs8112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 2 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 190 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 has 414% lower power consumption.

R9 285, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256 and Radeon R9 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 285 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256 or Radeon R9 285, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.