Radeon PRO V710 vs Data Center GPU Max NEXT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRialto BridgeNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204803456
Core clock speedno data1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate2,048432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUs1280216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthOAM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 GB28 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed3.1 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth3,205 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 158 Watt

Data Center GPU Max NEXT has a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 406.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max NEXT and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Data Center GPU Max NEXT is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 46 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.