Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics vs CMP 40HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking278not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.37no data
Power efficiency9.44no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTU106Beema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2021 (5 years ago)6 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304128
Core clock speed1470 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate237.66.400
Floating-point processing power7.603 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2021 6 June 2014
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 15 Watt

CMP 40HX has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

R4E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 1133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between CMP 40HX and Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that CMP 40HX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 75 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 40HX or Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.