GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Arctic Sound 2T

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated10
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.14
Power efficiencyno data18.06
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameArctic SoundGB203
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2021 (4 years ago)20 February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680 ×28960
Core clock speed900 MHz2300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2452 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate216.0 ×2686.6
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS ×243.94 TFLOPS
ROPs120 ×2128
TMUs240 ×2280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×216 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s ×2896.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 5070 Ti has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 585 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 2T or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.