Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Arc Pro A60
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Pro A60 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.
Arc Pro A60 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 235 | 441 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 12.81 | no data |
Architecture | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) | Xe LPG (2023) |
GPU code name | DG2-256 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 6 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 4 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1950 MHz |
Number of transistors | 11,500 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 262.4 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 8.397 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 64 | no data |
TMUs | 128 | no data |
Tensor Cores | 256 | no data |
Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 55−60
+120%
| 25
−120%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Fortnite | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Fortnite | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Fortnite | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
This is how Arc Pro A60 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:
- Arc Pro A60 is 120% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 24.19 | 10.38 |
Recency | 6 June 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
Arc Pro A60 has a 133% higher aggregate performance score.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc Pro A60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.
Be aware that Arc Pro A60 is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.