Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Arc Pro A40

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated24
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.43
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 August 2022 (2 years ago)27 July 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245120
Core clock speed1500 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz2245 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate108.8718.4
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs64320
Ray Tracing Cores880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.01x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2022 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 260 Watt

Arc Pro A40 has 420% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Pro A40 and Radeon RX 7900 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Pro A40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Pro A40
Arc Pro A40
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 12 votes

Rate Arc Pro A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 743 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.