Arc B580 vs Arc Pro A30M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Pro A30M with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

Arc Pro A30M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
15.05

Arc B580 outperforms Arc Pro A30M by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking357107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.78
Power efficiency20.9814.58
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe2 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-128BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date8 August 2022 (2 years ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1500 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0427.2
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs64160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Cores820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s456.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Pro A30M 15.05
Arc B580 39.75
+164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Pro A30M 5862
Arc B580 15479
+164%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−180%
126
+180%
1440p24−27
−183%
68
+183%
4K14−16
−193%
41
+193%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.98
1440pno data3.66
4Kno data6.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 206
+0%
206
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 148
+0%
148
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 193
+0%
193
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 101
+0%
101
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 236
+0%
236
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry 5 149
+0%
149
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 78
+0%
78
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Arc Pro A30M and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 180% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 183% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 193% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.05 39.75
Recency 8 August 2022 16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 190 Watt

Arc Pro A30M has 280% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 164.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A30M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 462 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Pro A30M or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.