GeForce GTS 450 vs Arc Graphics 130V

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 140V
VS
GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with GeForce GTS 450, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
16 GB LPDDR5x
11.62
+240%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms GTS 450 by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
GTS 450 GTS 450

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking410728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.66
Power efficiencyno data2.25
ArchitectureXe²Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGF106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)13 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7192
Core clock speedno data783 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data106 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rateno data25.06
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.7 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 130V 11.62
+240%
GTS 450 3.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4481
+240%
GTS 450 1318

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+233%
30
−233%
Full HD31
−22.6%
38
+22.6%
1200p90−95
+233%
27
−233%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and GTS 450 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 233% faster in 900p
  • GTS 450 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 130V is 233% faster in 1200p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.62 3.42
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 40 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 239.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook card while GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 6 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2643 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.