Arc B570 vs Arc A380

Place in the ranking	350	151
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.36	86.48
Power efficiency	14.69	16.23
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Xe2 (2024)
GPU code name	DG2-128	BMG-G21
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)	16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B570 has 99% better value for money than Arc A380.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2304
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	2500 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	131.2	360.0
Floating-point processing power	4.198 TFLOPS	11.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	64	144
Tensor Cores	128	144
Ray Tracing Cores	8	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	222 mm	272 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1937 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	186.0 GB/s	380.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
DLSS	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A380 14.78

Arc B570 32.66
+121%

Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A380 6228

Arc B570 13765
+121%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−113%

100−110
+113%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.17

−44.8%

2.19
+44.8%

Arc B570 has 45% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset
Full HD
Medium Preset
Full HD
High Preset
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Full HD
Epic Preset
1440p
High Preset
1440p
Ultra Preset
1440p
Epic Preset
4K
High Preset
4K
Ultra Preset
4K
Epic Preset

Counter-Strike 2	183 −119%	400−450 +119%
Cyberpunk 2077	41 −120%	90−95 +120%
Hogwarts Legacy	23 −117%	50−55 +117%

Battlefield 5	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Counter-Strike 2	122 −113%	260−270 +113%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	62 −110%	130−140 +110%
Fortnite	85−90 −112%	180−190 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	76 −111%	160−170 +111%
Forza Horizon 5	72 −108%	150−160 +108%
Hogwarts Legacy	18 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
Valorant	120−130 −120%	270−280 +120%

Battlefield 5	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Counter-Strike 2	57 −111%	120−130 +111%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210 −99%	400−450 +99%
Cyberpunk 2077	29 −107%	60−65 +107%
Far Cry 5	57 −111%	120−130 +111%
Fortnite	85−90 −112%	180−190 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	72 −108%	150−160 +108%
Forza Horizon 5	64 −119%	140−150 +119%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 −112%	70−75 +112%
Hogwarts Legacy	13 −108%	27−30 +108%
Metro Exodus	40 −113%	85−90 +113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	66 −112%	140−150 +112%
Valorant	120−130 −120%	270−280 +120%

Battlefield 5	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −112%	55−60 +112%
Far Cry 5	52 −112%	110−120 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	57 −111%	120−130 +111%
Hogwarts Legacy	7 −100%	14−16 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 −121%	75−80 +121%
Valorant	120−130 −120%	270−280 +120%

Fortnite

85−90
−112%

180−190

+112%

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −117%	65−70 +117%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	110−120 −114%	240−250 +114%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −107%	300−310 +107%
Valorant	150−160 −94.8%	300−310 +94.8%

Battlefield 5	40−45 −114%	90−95 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −121%	75−80 +121%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
Hogwarts Legacy	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%

Fortnite

30−35

−121%

75−80
+121%

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Valorant	80−85 −117%	180−190 +117%

Battlefield 5	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%

Fortnite

14−16

−100%

30−33
+100%

This is how Arc A380 and Arc B570 compete in popular games:

Arc B570 is 113% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.78	32.66
Recency	14 June 2022	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt

Arc A380 has 100% lower power consumption.

Arc B570, on the other hand, has a 121% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.