Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 314 | 468 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 96 |
| Boost clock speed | 2300 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 10 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR4 |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | DirectX 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36
+100%
| 18−20
−100%
|
| 1440p | 17
+88.9%
| 9−10
−88.9%
|
| 4K | 14
+100%
| 7−8
−100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 53
+96.3%
|
27−30
−96.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 111
+102%
|
55−60
−102%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+106%
|
18−20
−106%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 40
+90.5%
|
21−24
−90.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+78%
|
40−45
−78%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85
+88.9%
|
45−50
−88.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+106%
|
18−20
−106%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+25.8%
|
30−35
−25.8%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+67.9%
|
55−60
−67.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+73.2%
|
40−45
−73.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+104%
|
27−30
−104%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+97%
|
30−35
−97%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+48.9%
|
90−95
−48.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 28
+100%
|
14−16
−100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+78%
|
40−45
−78%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42
+100%
|
21−24
−100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+54.6%
|
140−150
−54.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+106%
|
18−20
−106%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
+16.1%
|
30−35
−16.1%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+67.9%
|
55−60
−67.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+73.2%
|
40−45
−73.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+104%
|
27−30
−104%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 25
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
| Metro Exodus | 28
+47.4%
|
18−20
−47.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+97%
|
30−35
−97%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48
+92%
|
24−27
−92%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+48.9%
|
90−95
−48.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+78%
|
40−45
−78%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+106%
|
18−20
−106%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
+9.7%
|
30−35
−9.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+73.2%
|
40−45
−73.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+97%
|
30−35
−97%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+91.4%
|
70−75
−91.4%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 90−95
+67.9%
|
55−60
−67.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+94.4%
|
18−20
−94.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+78.9%
|
70−75
−78.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+92.9%
|
85−90
−92.9%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+62.5%
|
100−110
−62.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+123%
|
21−24
−123%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+100%
|
8−9
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 32
+68.4%
|
18−20
−68.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+100%
|
14−16
−100%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40
+105%
|
18−20
−105%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−122%
|
20−22
+122%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+180%
|
5−6
−180%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+150%
|
10−11
−150%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+98%
|
45−50
−98%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+136%
|
10−12
−136%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
16−18
−87.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 100% faster in 1080p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 89% faster in 1440p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 100% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 180% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 122% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is ahead in 35 tests (83%)
- Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 4 tests (10%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (7%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.93 | 8.56 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 86.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
