GeForce 6600 vs Arc 7-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 7-Core iGPU with GeForce 6600, including specs and performance data.

Arc 7-Core iGPU
2023
17.55
+7877%

Arc 7-Core iGPU outperforms 6600 by a whopping 7877% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3131373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUNV43 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)12 August 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data146 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm110 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.400
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26 0−1
Elden Ring 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 23 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 66 0−1
Metro Exodus 45−50 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 0−1
Valorant 70−75 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21 0−1
Dota 2 24 0−1
Elden Ring 55−60 0−1
Far Cry 5 33 0−1
Fortnite 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Forza Horizon 4 54 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24 0−1
Metro Exodus 45−50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+12100%
1−2
−12100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 0−1
Valorant 70−75 0−1
World of Tanks 210−220
+10650%
2−3
−10650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 44 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+12100%
1−2
−12100%
Valorant 70−75 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30 0−1
Elden Ring 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+8000%
2−3
−8000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130
+12000%
1−2
−12000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 30−33 0−1
Elden Ring 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Fortnite 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Valorant 20−22 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.55 0.22
Recency 14 December 2023 12 August 2004
Chip lithography 5 nm 110 nm

Arc 7-Core iGPU has a 7877.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 7-Core iGPU is a notebook card while GeForce 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Arc 7-Core iGPU
NVIDIA GeForce 6600
GeForce 6600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 279 votes

Rate GeForce 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.