GeForce RTX 4080 vs Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 3 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 38.00 |
| Architecture | no data | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | no data | AD103-300-A1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 9728 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 2205 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2505 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 761.5 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 48.74 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 310 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 22400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 716.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 20 September 2022 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 320 Watt |
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU has 3100% lower power consumption.
RTX 4080, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU and GeForce RTX 4080. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
