GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated54
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.35
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR200AD106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 August 2001 (23 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed230 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate1.840244.1
Floating-point processing powerno data15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed190 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.08 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2001 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 4 nm

RTX 4070 Mobile has an age advantage of 21 year, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV and GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1782 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.