Radeon HD 8210E vs ATI All-In-Wonder 7500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.81
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV200Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 April 2002 (22 years ago)23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed260 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors60 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data9 Watt
Texture fill rate1.5602.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed180 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.76 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2002 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

HD 8210E has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500 and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500
All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.