ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.38
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameRV635RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)7 December 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed722 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors378 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate5.7761.600
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 24 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1050, on the other hand, has 129.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and Radeon X1050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder HD
All-In-Wonder HD
ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or Radeon X1050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.