Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.59
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV635Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)4 November 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1204608
Core clock speed722 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors378 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776633.6
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS20.28 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length232 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 4 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 300 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 has 445% lower power consumption.

Pro V620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD 3650 and Radeon Pro V620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD 3650 or Radeon Pro V620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.