Quadro T600 Mobile vs AeroBox GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated299
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKryptosTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date13 March 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896896
Boost clock speed985 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate55.1674.76
Floating-point performance1.765 gflops2.392 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2132 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

AeroBox GPU has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and Quadro T600 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a desktop card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.