GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition vs AeroBox GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameKryptosG94
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2020 (4 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89664
Core clock speed935 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data505 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate55.1619.20
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s44.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 21 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

AeroBox GPU has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

9600 GT Green Edition, on the other hand, has 5.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook card while GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition
GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 10 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.