Radeon RX 6750 XT vs A10G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10G CMP 90HX Quadro RTX A6000 RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared A10G with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

A10G
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
48.59

RX 6750 XT outperforms A10G by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

A10G A10G
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.88
Power efficiency22.2114.82
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores92162560
Core clock speed1320 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate492.5416.0
Floating-point processing power31.52 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288160
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores7240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1563 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10G 48.59
RX 6750 XT 54.05
+11.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

A10G 18723
RX 6750 XT 20829
+11.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
−16.4%
163
+16.4%
1440p75−80
−13.3%
85
+13.3%
4K40−45
−22.5%
49
+22.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.37
1440pno data6.46
4Kno data11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
+0%
304
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
+0%
210
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260
+0%
260
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 158
+0%
158
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+0%
186
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hitman 3 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 99
+0%
99
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how A10G and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 16% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 13% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 23% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 48.59 54.05
Recency 12 April 2021 3 March 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

A10G has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the A10G in performance tests.

Be aware that A10G is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA A10G
A10G
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

A10G A10G
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
A10G A10G
vs
L40S L40S
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
P106-090 P106 090
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
7800 GT GeForce 7800 GT
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
GT 750M Mac Edition GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
Graphics 512SP Mobile Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
GT 730 OEM GeForce GT 730 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 40 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2593 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.