Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs A10G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 PCIe A10G A40 PCIe CMP 90HX Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200 Quadro RTX A6000 RTX A40 RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5500
VS
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared A10G with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

A10G
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
41.90
+1000%

A10G outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 1000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

A10G A10G
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking74683
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.13no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA102Raphael
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)26 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9216128
Core clock speed1320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1710 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate492.5no data
Floating-point processing power31.52 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1563 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth600.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD200−210
+953%
19
−953%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how A10G and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • A10G is 953% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 41.90 3.81
Recency 12 April 2021 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm

A10G has a 999.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that A10G is a workstation card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA A10G
A10G
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

A10G A10G
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
A10G A10G
vs
L40S L40S
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 3060 GA104 3060 GA104
RX 6800M RX 6800M
vs
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
A10G A10G
vs
T1000 T1000
A10G A10G
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
vs
RX 6850M XT RX 6850M XT
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
vs
RTX 3090 SUPER RTX 3090 SUPER
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
vs
CMP 170HX CMP 170HX
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
vs
Arc 5 A550M Arc 5 A550M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 46 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 263 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A10G or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.