Radeon 890M vs A100 SXM4 40 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameGA100Strix Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69121024
Core clock speed1095 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate609.1185.6
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs16032
TMUs43264
Tensor Cores432no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL2.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 2566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 40 GB and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 40 GB is a workstation card while Radeon 890M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
A100 SXM4 40 GB
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 107 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.