GeForce GT 240M LE vs A100 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGA100G96C
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 June 2020 (4 years ago)15 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691232
Core clock speed1410 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate609.19.600
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs1608
TMUs43216
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR2
Maximum RAM amount40 GB512 MB
Memory bus width5120 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.01.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 June 2020 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 23 Watt

A100 PCIe has an age advantage of 10 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has 987% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 PCIe and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 PCIe is a workstation card while GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 PCIe
A100 PCIe
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 31 vote

Rate A100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.