Ryzen 7 6800U vs Z-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Z-60
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 5 Watt
0.16
Ryzen 7 6800U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
12.96
+8000%

Ryzen 7 6800U outperforms Z-60 by a whopping 8000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3285590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency3.0381.72
Architecture codenameHondo (2012)Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date9 October 2012 (12 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm6 nm
Die size75 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP7
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6250 (276 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Z-60 0.16
Ryzen 7 6800U 12.96
+8000%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Z-60 262
Ryzen 7 6800U 20584
+7756%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Z-60 669
Ryzen 7 6800U 6450
+864%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Z-60 1249
Ryzen 7 6800U 35314
+2727%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Z-60 114
Ryzen 7 6800U 4.54
+2411%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Z-60 0
Ryzen 7 6800U 21
+5611%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Z-60 0.2
Ryzen 7 6800U 2.88
+1340%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Z-60 348
Ryzen 7 6800U 4639
+1233%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Z-60 2
Ryzen 7 6800U 101
+5082%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Z-60 11
Ryzen 7 6800U 220
+1853%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 12.96
Integrated graphics card 0.24 14.99
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

Z-60 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 6800U, on the other hand, has a 8000% higher aggregate performance score, 6145.8% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 6800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Z-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Z-60 and Ryzen 7 6800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Z-60
Z-60
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Ryzen 7 6800U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Z-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 317 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Z-60 or Ryzen 7 6800U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.