Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon w9-3475X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3475X
2023
36 cores / 72 threads, 300 Watt
41.63
+233%
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.52

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking62621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.05no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency12.8968.40
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,739no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores368 (Octa-Core)
Threads728
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache82.5 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1124

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3475X 41.63
+233%
Ultra 7 258V 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w9-3475X 64889
+233%
Ultra 7 258V 19509

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.63 12.52
Recency 15 February 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 36 8
Threads 72 8
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon w9-3475X has a 232.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1664.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w9-3475X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon w9-3475X is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3475X and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3475X or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.